<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>docker on Austin Burnett</title><link>/categories/docker.html</link><description>Recent content in docker on Austin Burnett</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="/categories/docker/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Logstash and confd</title><link>/blog/logstash-confd.html</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/logstash-confd.html</guid><description>In my last post I talked about making your application containers more portable in regards to logging. The way my team ended up doing this was by shipping a container along with our application container that served as a data container to mount application logs to and having Logstash run in that container with application logs as the input. I mentioned in the previous post that I had found adding as much information to the logs as you can at the source will alleviate problems later.</description></item><item><title>Portable Docker Logging</title><link>/blog/docker-logging.html</link><pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/docker-logging.html</guid><description>In the past couple years, the way we think about our infrastructure has undergone a makeover. Without a doubt, the biggest shift in operations and infrastructure has been towards containers. As a result, we&amp;rsquo;ve been forced to question the way we do infrastructure. Before containers, you&amp;rsquo;re &amp;ldquo;deliverable&amp;rdquo; was the application itself. Your configuration management tools would provision your host to be able to run that application. With containers, you&amp;rsquo;re &amp;ldquo;deliverable&amp;rdquo; is, well, the container.</description></item><item><title>Blog Ops'd</title><link>/blog/blog-ops.html</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>/blog/blog-ops.html</guid><description>For some time now, I have wanted to apply configuration management to my blog. It&amp;rsquo;s been about a year since I first stood up my blog. I began with a cloud server, Nginx, and a static HTML page. From there, I graduated to a Python application with Postgres. The next obvious choice was to shim everything into Docker containers (yes, I was affected by the Great Container Obsession of 2014-15). During those transitions, I used scripts and text files to make things somewhat repeatable, but they still required my memory and manual intervention - both limited and error prone.</description></item></channel></rss>